<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links for an ex-leper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collectedmiscellany.com/2005/10/links-for-an-ex-leper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collectedmiscellany.com/2005/10/links-for-an-ex-leper/</link>
	<description>seemingly random thoughts on books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:27:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Green</title>
		<link>http://collectedmiscellany.com/2005/10/links-for-an-ex-leper/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 01:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collectedmiscellany.com/2005/10/links-for-an-ex-leper/#comment-790</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that Bloom&#039;s remarks are over-the-top. I don&#039;t like Bush (I *really* don&#039;t like Bush), but to throw the word &quot;fascist&quot; around doesn&#039;t accomplish much.

However, it is useful to juxtapose Bloom&#039;s political comments with his literary judgments. It belies the notion that because he prefers literature to theory and &quot;cultural studies&quot; that he&#039;s therefore some kind of conservative curmudgeon. One can be a liberal and also think literary scholarship has taken a very bad turn.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that Bloom&#8217;s remarks are over-the-top. I don&#8217;t like Bush (I *really* don&#8217;t like Bush), but to throw the word &#8220;fascist&#8221; around doesn&#8217;t accomplish much.</p>
<p>However, it is useful to juxtapose Bloom&#8217;s political comments with his literary judgments. It belies the notion that because he prefers literature to theory and &#8220;cultural studies&#8221; that he&#8217;s therefore some kind of conservative curmudgeon. One can be a liberal and also think literary scholarship has taken a very bad turn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://collectedmiscellany.com/2005/10/links-for-an-ex-leper/comment-page-1/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collectedmiscellany.com/2005/10/links-for-an-ex-leper/#comment-789</guid>
		<description>I saw Vonnegut say something like this recently. It makes me laugh half the time because I suspect history will view Bush as a very important president, one who helped build conservative politics in America.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw Vonnegut say something like this recently. It makes me laugh half the time because I suspect history will view Bush as a very important president, one who helped build conservative politics in America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

