Archive for March, 2009

March 23rd, 2009

His Majesty’s Dragon by Naomi Novik

by Kevin Holtsberry

Life is weird sometimes.  I stumbled upon The Coming of Dragons (The Darkest Age I)  in the grocery store.  As I happened to have dragons on the mind I found out that His Majesty’s Dragon (the first in a series by Naomi Novik) was available for free for [amazon-product region="us" text="Kindle" type="text"]B00154JDAI[/amazon-product]users.  So grabbed it.  Who cares if you don’t read it right away if it is free. A free book is a free book, etc.

But when I couldn’t get a hold of The Book of the Sword (Darkest Age II) right away I went ahead and kept the dragon theme going by reading HMD.  It turned out to be a very interesting experience.  I am a bit torn about the series but glad I read the book.

Here is what Publishers Weekly had to say:

In this delightful first novel, the opening salvo of a trilogy, Novik seamlessly blends fantasy into the history of the Napoleonic wars. Here be dragons, beasts that can speak and reason, bred for strength and speed and used for aerial support in battle. Each nation has its own breeds, but none are so jealously guarded as the mysterious dragons of China. Veteran Capt. Will Laurence of the British Navy is therefore taken aback after his crew captures an egg from a French ship and it hatches a Chinese dragon, which Laurence names Temeraire. When Temeraire bonds with the captain, the two leave the navy to sign on with His Majesty’s sadly understaffed Aerial Corps, which takes on the French in sprawling, detailed battles that Novik renders with admirable attention to 19th-century military tactics. Though the dragons they encounter are often more fully fleshed-out than the stereotypical human characters, the author’s palpable love for her subject and a story rich with international, interpersonal and internal struggles more than compensate.

As practically every reviewer has noted the genre here is really, as Rachel Hartigan Shea put it in her WaPo review, “the dashing Brits-on-ships genre perfected by Patrick O’Brian.”  The dragons are the only fantasy aspect of the book and it really is historical fiction not fantasy.  But for puting dragons in just such a setting Novik deserves credit because  it is a creative twist and she pulls it off.

read more »

March 20th, 2009

Day half gone now. What are t…

by Kevin Holtsberry

Day half gone now. What are the odds I write a serious book review late Friday afternoon?

March 19th, 2009

I never seem to have time for …

by Kevin Holtsberry

I never seem to have time for longer and/or serious reviews despite books that deserve it. Need to knuckle down tomorrow and finish one.

March 19th, 2009

In the Mail

by Kevin Holtsberry
Cover of "Just Take My Heart: A Novel"

Cover of Just Take My Heart: A Novel

–> Just Take My Heart by Mary Higgins Clark

Kirkus Reviews

An assistant prosecutor trying the biggest case of her life doesn’t realize that the victim she’s hoping to avenge isn’t the only damsel in distress. Fifteen years after her actress roommate Jamie Evans was strangled in Central Park, Broadway sensation Natalie Raines has the awful experience of meeting and recognizing her killer. Hours later, Natalie is shot to death herself. But Bergen County prosecutor Ted Wesley, who never called Jamie’s murder anything but a robbery gone bad, fails to connect the two crimes. Instead, he indicts Gregg Aldrich, Natalie’s estranged husband and former agent. The most damning (and virtually the only) testimony against Gregg comes from career burglar Jimmy Easton, who bargained down the sentence for his latest job in return for a story about Gregg offering to pay him $25,000 to kill Natalie. Jimmy should be a terrible witness, but he isn’t. So even though Michael Gordon, the Courtside TV host who’s kept an ominous distance from his old friend in the weeks leading to the trial, runs a series of informal polls that indicate that nearly half the TV audience thinks Gregg is innocent, things look a lot blacker for the defendant in the courtroom. Emily Wallace, the assistant prosecutor Wesley has assigned to the case, wonders if Gregg is guilty after all. Although she doesn’t know it, Emily has much bigger problems to deal with. Her solicitous neighbor Zach Lanning is actually Charley Muir, who vanished after killing his wife’s family in Iowa and now has his eye on Emily. The closer Emily gets to nailing Natalie’s murderer, the closer a second, unrelated murderer is getting to nailing her. Clark (Where Are You Now?, 2008, etc.) handles the courtroom scenescapably, and fans will be as excited as ever coming down the home stretch. It’s a shame that the climax awaiting them is the most strained and silly the bestselling author has ever fobbed off on her devoted readers.

–> [amazon-product region="us" text="Love Child: A Memoir of Family Lost and Found by Allegra Huston" type="text"]1416551573[/amazon-product]

Publishers Weekly

Huston’s memoir begins when she is five years old, learning of her mother’s death from her godfather. Although she is sent to live with her father, the film director John Huston, he is an intermittent presence in her life. Then, when she is 12, Allegra’s stepmother informs her that her real father is the British historian John Julius Norwich. Huston, who spent several years as an editor in British publishing before creating a writers’ workshop in New Mexico, skillfully integrates her childhood memories with revelations from her mother’s correspondence, recounting her often-awkward encounters with “my dad” (Huston) and “my father” (Norwich) with great sensitivity. Although she spent part of her adolescence living with her older sister, Anjelica, there isn’t much in the way of Hollywood gossip beyond fleeting scenes of Marlon Brando playing chess and verbal abuse from Ryan O’Neal. Instead, the emphasis lies in young Allegra’s constant feelings of alienation and the subtle development of familial affections that culminate with Hustons and Norwichs coming together to witness the christening of her own son. Where many memoirists compete to see who’s had the most outrageous life, this story stands out in its quiet poignancy.

–>[amazon-product region="us" text="The Last Divine Office: Henry VIII and the Dissolution of the Monasteries by Geoffrey Moorhouse" type="text"]1933346183[/amazon-product]

Publishers Weekly

In this rich study, British historian Moorhouse (Great Harry’s Navy) portrays the destruction of England’s 650 Catholic monasteries and nunneries in the 1530s as a brazen smash-and-grab by a cash-strapped King Henry and his crafty vicar-general, Thomas Cromwell. After a beady-eyed inventory of assets by Cromwell’s lawyer-accountants, Moorhouse notes, religious houses were seized or semivoluntarily “surrendered” to the Crown by terrified abbots, their occupants dispersed, their estates auctioned off, their shrines vandalized and buildings demolished, their jewelry and chalices sent to the royal treasury. Moorhouse finds continuity amid the upheaval by focusing on Durham Priory, a Benedictine monastery with a celebrated cathedral, that survived to become an Anglican Deanery. Drawing on monastic archives, the author vividly recreates the Priory’s close-knit community and the warmth and grandeur of its Catholic observances -whose spirit, he contends, infused the Anglican era. His story is partly about the triumph of modernity, with its mercenary logic and remorseless bureaucracy, over medieval values of tradition and sacredness. But as it mourns what was lost in the English Reformation, Moorhouse’s absorbing account takes stock of what was not.

March 18th, 2009

Book Confessions Meme

by Kevin Holtsberry
Mmm . . . books

My son Max loves his books via Flickr

I haven’t done one of these in ages but saw this at Brandywine Books and thought it would be interesting.

1. To mark your page you: use a bookmark, bend the page corner, leave the book open face down?

I tend to use bookmarks (I have a lot of them lying around from books stores, publicists, etc.) but have been known to do all of the above at one time or the other.

2. Do you lend your books?

I will confess I am shy about loaning out books as I am loathe to lose them.

3. You find an interesting passage: you write in your book or NO WRITING IN BOOKS!

I will confess I use light pencil marks to make notations in non-fiction.  It is the easiest way for me to find what I need to write reviews or get quotes later.  I don’t write in fiction for the most part (might occasionally turn down a corner for a choice passage).

4. Dust jackets – leave it on or take it off.

Always take them off.

5. Hard cover, paperback, skip it and get the audio book?

I prefer hardbacks for those I buy.  I haven’t really gotten into audio books yet.

6. Do you shelve your books by subject, author, or size and color of the book spines?

Non-fiction by subject, then author.  Fiction by genre roughly, then author. I also try to get the various sizes to be aesthetically pleasing on the shelf.

7. Buy it or borrow it from the library later?

My first instinct is to buy – if I don’t get it from a publisher – but have been using the library a lot more lately out of necessity.

8. Do you put your name on your books – scribble your name in the cover, fancy bookplate, or stamp?

None of the above.  Hence the nervousness about lending them out.

9. Most of the books you own are rare and out-of-print books or recent publications?

A lot of history and conservative classics are out of print.  Most fiction is in print.

10. Page edges – deckled or straight?

Either works for me.

11. How many books do you read at one time?

I used to strictly read one book at a time, but recently that has changed.  Normally, I will be reading just one fiction and one non but have at times been reading 3 or 4.

12. Be honest, ever tear a page from a book?

Nope.  My wife has some friends that create altered books as art.  The very concept disrturbs me.

Have a blog?  Post your answers and link here.  If not, leave them in the comments.

Tags: