<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Shack by William P. Young</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collectedmiscellany.com/2009/06/the-shack-by-william-p-young/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collectedmiscellany.com/2009/06/the-shack-by-william-p-young/</link>
	<description>seemingly random thoughts on books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:27:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pak Chin</title>
		<link>http://collectedmiscellany.com/2009/06/the-shack-by-william-p-young/comment-page-1/#comment-2567</link>
		<dc:creator>Pak Chin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collectedmiscellany.com/?p=2781#comment-2567</guid>
		<description>I too have read Forgiving Ararat and was researching for materials between The Shack, Lovely Bones and Forgiving Ararat. It&#039;s become quite a heated debate especially since the premiere of The Lovely Bones in Sydney last week.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like how The Shack use interesting characters and ideas to help break the literalness that sometimes our theology is wrapped in, but I much prefer how Forgiving Ararat creates the platform of discussion about life and death, religion, politics and so much more. As for Lovely Bones, let&#039;s just say it was a weak attempt at nurturing a great idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have read Forgiving Ararat and was researching for materials between The Shack, Lovely Bones and Forgiving Ararat. It&#39;s become quite a heated debate especially since the premiere of The Lovely Bones in Sydney last week.</p>
<p>I like how The Shack use interesting characters and ideas to help break the literalness that sometimes our theology is wrapped in, but I much prefer how Forgiving Ararat creates the platform of discussion about life and death, religion, politics and so much more. As for Lovely Bones, let&#39;s just say it was a weak attempt at nurturing a great idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Lee</title>
		<link>http://collectedmiscellany.com/2009/06/the-shack-by-william-p-young/comment-page-1/#comment-2559</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collectedmiscellany.com/?p=2781#comment-2559</guid>
		<description>I loved the Shack and found it to be a creative and imaginative vehicle to spread the love of God. Another such book is Forgiving Ararat by Gita Nazareth. It&#039;s about a woman who unlocks the mystery of her own murder from the afterlife. It&#039;s a historical and religious exploration within an exciting supernatural thriller. I&#039;m a publicist and fan of the book and I&#039;d love to read your comments here if you choose to read Forgiving Ararat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the Shack and found it to be a creative and imaginative vehicle to spread the love of God. Another such book is Forgiving Ararat by Gita Nazareth. It&#39;s about a woman who unlocks the mystery of her own murder from the afterlife. It&#39;s a historical and religious exploration within an exciting supernatural thriller. I&#39;m a publicist and fan of the book and I&#39;d love to read your comments here if you choose to read Forgiving Ararat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

