Regardless of what you think of religion in general, or Christianity in particular, all those past centuries of widespread Bible reading were wonderfully enriching to our language. Now that is all slipping away, and our language is correspondingly poorer. I noticed this a few years ago, when I complained to my Wall Street boss, a lady with a degree from a good university and a six-digit salary, that in giving me a project to complete without the proper means to complete it, she was asking me to make bricks without straw. She stared at me uncomprehendingly. “Bricks? Straw? What on earth are you talking about, John?”

It happened again the other day. In conversation with some intelligent and well-educated Americans, I used the word “covet.” Blank looks. Then, nervously (I am not a stranger to these people): “Er, John, do you mean… cover?” No, I said, I meant “covet,” as in the Tenth Commandment. You know: Thou shalt not covet they neighbor’s ox, nor his ass… Now they were looking at each other as if I had lapsed into Klingon. Where is Roy Moore when you need him?

I agree. Our language and our country are built on stories and ideas of the Bible, particularly the King James translation, though Shakespeare used the Bishops Bible, I believe, and the Pilgrims used the Geneva Bible, a type of Reformation study Bible. Regardless the specific translation or printing most used during the founding of the United States, the English Bible has molded our cultural language use after its image.

The lead editor of the Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, E. D. Hirsch, Jr., agrees.

No one in the English-speaking world can be considered literate without a basic knowledge of the Bible. Literate people in India, whose religious traditions are not based on the Bible but whose common language is English, must know about the Bible in order to understand English within their own country. All educated speakers of American English need to understand what is meant when someone describes a contest as being between David and Goliath, or whether a person who has the “wisdom of Solomon” is wise or foolish, or whether saying “My cup runneth over” means the person feels fortunate or unfortunate.

What are your thoughts on the pilgrims and the first Thanksgiving? I’m both amused and distressed by the distaste some historians have for the pilgrims religious motives. They came to this land, sailing off the end of the known world in a sense, to worship the Lord in freedom. When the arrived, they did not disembark until a day later, staying on the Mayflower to thank the Lord for the success of their difficult voyage. The Mayflower Compact, you may remember, established civil government for the purpose of glorifying God, honoring King James I, and advancing the Christianity. A historian in the documentary described the governments role in that advancement as upholding justice and the law fairly and not forcing citizens to submit to a written creed which is what England was doing at the time. This is the atmosphere of the first Thanksgiving; but some writers want to label parts of the activities “secular.”

Like this from Pilgrim Hall: “Although the event of 1621 is known today as the ‘First Thanksgiving,’ that harvest feast had many secular elements and would not have been considered a religious day of thanksgiving by the Pilgrims.” On another page, Pilgrim Hall reports, “While both the Pilgrims and the Native Americans would have expressed their thanks to God on a daily basis, this festival was a secular celebration, albeit informed – as was every aspect of Pilgrim life – by their deep knowledge of, and regard for, Scripture.”

These statements work only if you accept a dichotomy of the secular and the sacred, which I believe most Americans and Europeans do. I suggest this isn’t true.

In a December 1621 letter, Edward Winslow describes some of the first Thanksgiving events:

At which time, amongst other recreations, we exercised our arms, many of the Indians coming amongst us, and among the rest their greatest king Massasoit, with some ninety men, whom for three days we entertained and feasted, and they went out and killed five deer, which they brought to the plantation and bestowed on our governor, and upon the captain and others. And although it be not always so plentiful as it was at this time with us, yet by the goodness of God, we are so far from want that we often wish you partakers of our plenty.

If we asked Winslow which of these details were secular, that is apart from God, he would say none of them, if he understood our question. The pilgrims, even the natives, didn’t think within a secular/sacred dichotomy. Everything was sacred to them, and on this day of giving thanks to the Lord God who sustains the world and everyone in it, whether they follow him or hate him, I suggest that real life is thoroughly sacred.

The inner peace that many seek is found partly in this truth, that all of life is for the Creator’s glory. Everything was originally created good by him: food, family, homes. Everything “by the goodness of God.” Happy Thanksgiving.

Who are the ten authors dubbed “tastemakers,” that is, “writers whose work is having the greatest impact on our culture?” J.M. Coetzee, Don DeLillo, Joan Didion, Dave Eggers, Jonathan Safran Foer, Stephen King, Elmore Leonard, Philip Roth, J.K. Rowling, Zadie Smith.

[by way of The Book Glutton]

In related news, NY Times reporter Judith Miller has left the Times, I hope for greener pastures. The Times reports a letter she has written will run under the heading “Judith Miller’s Farewell” tomorrow. “Ms. Miller said she was leaving partly because some of her colleagues disagreed with her decision to testify in the C.I.A. leak case.”

I must say this whole Joe Wilson, Scooter Libby, CIA leak investigation is not right. The Times acted as if they had nothing to do with Miller’s reporting, as if covering themselves instead of helping uncover the truth they claimed to be after. Now, the prosecutor has indicted Libby, stating Wilson’s wife was not known to work at CIA as Libby had claimed. I understand four reporters have emerged to testify to the contrary. If it can be demonstrated that Wilson’s wife was not “outed” by Libby, can he still be charged?

I appeal to The American Thinker for more on this.

Number of blogs using these words

random: 1,061,144
thoughts: 1,518,601
musings: 292,308
rant: 325,315
crap: 1,049,776

book: 1,714,514
novel: 430,009
movie: 1,240,854
film: 1,576,304

stupid: 1,174,517
smart: 1,172,277
snarky: 20,783
zeitgeist: 11,823

Using Google’s Blogsearch engine

“Rationally persuasive writing is like house painting: it’s all in the preliminaries.” — Joel Jay Kassiola, San Francisco State University

“For me, writing is like sledding down a wide, steep slope. You can carefully pick your launching point, but often you don’t know exactly where you’ll end up until you’re already halfway down.” — Greg, The Writing Center, UNC-CH

“Writing is like walking in a deserted street. Out of the dust in the street you make a mud pie.” — John LeCarre, Absolute Friends

In case you forgot, whether you care or not, November is National Novel Writing Month.

The site publishes music opinions in its monthly “Reminiscing in Tempo,” which currently asks a handful of people in the world of jazz, “What is the greatest saxophone solo in the history of jazz?” Answers vary.

Composer and saxophone musician Salim Washington replies, “The obvious answer is that there is no such thing. There can be no such thing as the greatest saxophone solo, for several reasons. First, after a certain point the level of excellence achieved by some artists is so great, that the profundity of their contribution to the record of human feeling and experience renders it meaningless to subject their work to an hierarchical evaluation that is more akin to a sporting event than an artistic endeavor.” But he does choose John Coltrane’s 1963 “I Want to Talk About You.” The members of The Bad Plus also pick that song, but from a different performance.

Coleman Hawkins’ “Body and Soul” comes up a few times. Terry Teachout chooses Charlie Parker’s “Parker’s Mood,” and David Amram picks Charlie Parker’s “Night in Tunisia.”

About that first Hawkins piece, Kitty Margolis says, “It was so influential in my understanding of this music and specifically how a solo can be so logically constructed yet have an utterly transcendent effect. As a singer, hearing the original alongside Eddie Jefferson’s lyric version helped me connect the dots between voice and wind instrument, a concept which has informed my work ever since I started to grasp it.” But she concludes her opinion on sax solos with “The ‘greatest’ solo is the favorite one you’re listening to right now.”

McCabe was a Dominican priest, theologian, and editor of New Blackfriars and author of God Matters. He lived from 1926-2001, and was shaped by the 1960′s, with its clashes over situation ethics and the rise of liberation theology. Unfortunately, he was much taken with the latter, although he fought unwaveringly against the former. He would not tone down any expression of his convictions. His radical politics got him into trouble, but he was unrepentant:

He was sacked as editor of New Blackfriars in 1967 for remarking in one of his widely anticipated monthly editorials that the church “is quite plainly corrupt.” After his reinstatement three years later he began his first editorial, “As I was saying before I was so oddly interrupted.”

I remember that John Calvin did something similar after he returned to Geneva, having been kicked out due to a firm hold on Biblical doctrine. He had been in the middle of a long exposition of one of the books of the Bible, and when he returned after several years, picked up the exposition as if he’d never left. I wonder if he said, “You may remember in my last sermon . . .”